Rare 1907 Dime Errors (List & Pictures)
A dime does not need to lose its whole date to be noticeably off-center. On one 1907-D, the shift affected the bottoms of 07, yet the lightly worn coin still sold for $1,207.50 in September 2004.
Estimated values for the 1907 dime errors covered here span $20–$2,500. The quickest route is to inspect the date, turn over for the mint letter, and then compare the rim with the overall position of the design.
1. 1907 Dime Tiny Numeral Tops Hide in the Border: Misplaced Date Error
On the cataloged 1907-S MPD-002, the tops of an extra 0 and 7 sit among the border teeth below the regular date. The date punch had been placed too low on the die before the correct date was added.
These small fragments are outside the intended date row. An older general listing calls a misplaced-date variety MPD-001, so the two catalog names should not be treated as interchangeable.
How to Identify
First find S below the wreath bow on the back. Then use angled light to inspect the upper edges of the border teeth beneath the date.
Look for both the 0 and 7 tops, not just one taller-than-usual tooth. Keep the normal date in the photograph so the position of each extra fragment is clear.
Wear and dark toning can hide the small shapes. A match should follow their forms and locations rather than depend on a single bright spot.
What It’s Worth
$40–$600 is the estimate for confirmed circulated through lightly worn examples. The readability of the two extra numeral tops matters alongside ordinary condition.
An ANACS VF20 MPD-002 sold for $54 on March 4, 2024. VF20 means moderately worn, and that result provides a worn-coin comparison rather than a fixed price for every grade.
2. 1907 Dime Earlier Digit Pieces Touch the Main Date: Repunched Date Error
The Philadelphia RPD-002 has extra raised detail beside the knob of 9 and inside 0. Here, the date punch landed more than once near its proper position, leaving parts of the earlier impression.
This differs from the San Francisco misplaced digits down in the border. Denver and San Francisco repunched dates are also reported, but they require their own matches.

How to Identify
For Philadelphia RPD-002, confirm that there is no mint letter on the reverse. Examine the right side of the knob of 9 and the inside left of 0.
Both remnants should match the recorded pattern. Low, flat shelves caused by movement during striking are different from rounded surviving parts of punched digits.
If the dime has D or S, start with the appropriate mint’s reference instead. A Philadelphia close-up cannot establish another mint’s variety.
What It’s Worth
$30–$800 is the estimated range for the reported mint groups, covering circulated through lower-grade unworn examples. Better surfaces and clear remnants help support the stronger end.
The ANACS AU50 Philadelphia RPD-002 sold for $79 on March 4, 2024. That lightly worn coin is a specific comparison for its own pattern, not a sale of every reported 1907 repunched date.
3. 1907 Dime An Earlier O Survives beside the Mint Letter: Repunched Mintmark Error
New Orleans placed its O below the reverse bow. On the recognized O/O FS-501, part of an earlier O remains beside the final letter.
The mintmark was punched into the die by hand. A shift between impressions could leave an exposed curve that the die then repeated on its coins.

How to Identify
Compare the extra curve with the pictured PCGS XF40 FS-501. The O/O label means O over O, but does not by itself specify a compass direction.
A thick letter or an oddly shaped opening is not enough. Look for a genuine earlier contour and check the nearby surface for alteration.
Changing the light can separate a raised stroke from a shadow inside the O. A nick or swelling must not be mistaken for part of another complete letter.
What It’s Worth
$50–$650 is the estimate for confirmed circulated through lightly worn examples. PCGS records a $125 sale in December 2012 for a heavily worn G4 coin.
The 2023 XF40 listing showed $120 as a starting bid, with no public final amount supplied. That opening figure should not be counted as another completed sale.
4. 1907 Dime Raised Lines or Lumps Interrupt the Surface: Die Cracks and Cuds Error
A damaged die can leave a thin ridge, a small internal lump, or a broad patch connected to the rim. Silver flows into the tool’s cracks or missing areas during striking.
The broad rim-connected patch is called a cud. A tiny internal chip is part of the same broad die-failure group, but its size and position give it a different appearance.

How to Identify
Follow the raised metal and decide whether it is a line, an isolated lump, or a rim-connected patch. The supplied reports do not establish one location or mint for all 1907 die failures.
A large genuine cud may be paired with weak detail on the opposite face. That weakness supports the inspection but does not prove the cause by itself.
Look for natural edges without added-metal seams or impact-smoothed boundaries. A scratch cuts into the surface, while a crack in the die normally leaves a solid raised ridge.
What It’s Worth
$20–$150 is the estimated whole-coin range for modest cracks and small chips. A clear, confirmed cud on a circulated dime has a separate estimate of $100–$600.
The year guide discusses roughly $25–$180 for its general die-failure entry, rather than reporting an auction. A large missing piece of the die needs a more suitable comparison than a fine line does.
5. 1907 Dime A Curved Section of Metal Is Missing: Clipped Blank Error
A blank-cutting punch can overlap an earlier hole in the metal strip. The resulting disc is incomplete before it reaches the striking press.
The 1907 overview reports a curved clip without a specific mint, position, size, or graded specimen. Those details must come from the actual coin.
How to Identify
Inspect both ends of the missing curve for natural metal flow where the struck rim meets the gap. Weakness on the opposite rim can be another clue, although wear may hide it.
A normal 1907 dime is 90% silver, weighs about 2.50 grams, and measures about 17.9 millimeters. A clip can lower its weight, but ordinary wear also removes silver.
Fresh lips, saw marks, or file tracks suggest later cutting. The curved outline by itself cannot show when the metal went missing.
What It’s Worth
$50–$700 is the estimate for a substantial confirmed clip on a circulated through lightly worn example. The guide’s narrower general entry gives $45–$110.
No specific 1907 auction result supports either guide range. A small clip on a worn dime belongs with modest examples, while a large original defect needs a closer comparison before using the high end.
6. 1907 Dime The Coin Spreads Wider but Keeps Its Design: Broadstrike Error
Jim’s Coins described a 1907-D as an uncentered broadstrike in Good condition, with no edge grooves. “Good” is a coin grade indicating substantial wear.
The collar normally restrains the blank’s width as it is struck. Without that restraint, metal can spread outward while retaining the full design, even if the design sits unevenly inside the enlarged outline.
How to Identify
Trace the surviving design on both sides to see whether it remains complete. An off-center strike loses part of the intended picture; an uncentered broadstrike can keep it.
Measure the outline in more than one direction and inspect the edge. A smooth edge alone proves little on a heavily worn coin, and filing can also remove grooves.
Confirm the Denver D and look for natural expansion rather than grinding around the circumference. The overall shape, surviving design, and edge need to agree.
What It’s Worth
$100–$900 is the estimate for recognizable circulated 1907-D broadstrikes. The reported Good coin has no supplied selling price.
A different 1904-S broadstrike graded NGC AU55 sold for $460 in 2007. Its better preservation and different mint make it useful background rather than an exact value for the worn Denver example.
7. 1907 Dime Part of the Picture Falls beyond the Edge: Off-Center Strike Error
The documented 1907-D AU55 was struck 20% off-center toward five o’clock. The bottoms of 07 and parts of the final letters in AMERICA were affected.
A separate Philadelphia AU55 is reported 10% off-center toward seven o’clock. Each blank sat partly outside the dies, but the two coins have their own direction and amount of displacement.
How to Identify
Set the portrait upright and compare the surviving date with the missing design. On the Denver example, the affected lower digits and final AMERICA letters should fit the reported shift.
Both faces should show related missing details beside original blank metal. A cropped photograph of a bare crescent cannot establish the complete error by itself.
Check for grinding or stretching along the altered outline. Keep the Philadelphia coin’s seven-o’clock shift separate from the Denver coin’s five-o’clock pattern.
What It’s Worth
$400–$2,500 is the estimate for collectible circulated through lightly worn examples. A readable year, mint, condition, and visible offset all affect the comparison.
The Denver PCGS AU55 sold for $1,207.50 on September 11, 2004. No completed auction price is supplied for the separate Philadelphia dealer example.
Conclusion
The mint letter is especially helpful when checking the small 1907 varieties. Philadelphia’s date remnants, San Francisco’s misplaced digit tops, and New Orleans’ extra O each have their own matching pattern.
For larger errors, decide whether metal is missing, has spread outward, or was left unstruck beside an incomplete design. That distinction leads to a more useful price comparison than judging the coin’s odd shape alone.
