Rare 2019 Dime Errors (List & Pictures)
Ordinary 2019 dimes contain a copper center between silver-colored outer layers, giving some 2019 Roosevelt Dime errors a distinctive appearance. A Philadelphia coin missing about 80% of its front outer layer brought $139 in September 2024.
Estimated values across the categories here run from $5–$1,000. Follow the metal, outline, edge, and design in that order; these comparisons concern ordinary clad dimes, rather than the separate .999 silver collector Proofs.
1. 2019 Dime Copper Replaces Much of the Front Surface: Missing Clad Layer Error
The documented 2019-P example retains only part of its usual silver-colored front layer. It was described as about 80% missing and graded PCGS MS61 Full Bands.
A failed bond can allow an outer layer to separate and expose the copper center. Full Bands describes the reverse torch detail, not another layer error.
How to Identify
Normal ordinary dimes weigh about 2.268 grams, measure 17.9 millimeters, and have grooves around the edge. Lost outer metal should reduce weight, but artificial stripping and other damage can also do so.
Follow the boundary between the copper and remaining outer metal for original design and natural transitions. Grinding marks or an etched surface suggest a different explanation.
The 80% description concerns face area, so it cannot supply an exact missing weight. A 2019-S .999 silver Proof has no comparable copper sandwich to expose.
What It’s Worth
Genuine partial through extensive missing-layer errors are estimated at $50–$600. The 2019-P MS61 Full Bands example sold for $139 on September 16, 2024.
A 2018-P dime missing its front layer, graded MS64, brought $384 in July 2021. That coin has both a different date and better preservation, limiting a direct comparison.
2. 2019 Dime A Flap or Jagged Patch Separates Locally: Lamination Error
The reported 2019-D lamination involves local peeling or flaking. An attached flap or exposed patch can show where the metal separated into a layer.
This report does not establish that the entire disc split into two pieces. The scale and boundary of the separation matter.
How to Identify
Leave any attached flap untouched and inspect its connection to the original surface. Pry marks or scraping around the opening can indicate that metal was deliberately lifted later.
Compare nearby details with an undamaged Denver dime and inspect the edge as well as the face. A very small missing flake may produce little measurable weight loss.
What It’s Worth
Small genuine flakes are estimated at $10–$30, with larger visible separations around $30–$150. No individual sale is supplied for the reported Denver specimen.
A clear attached flap and undisturbed neighboring design can improve its appeal. The price of an extensive missing clad layer should not automatically be applied to a tiny local peel.
3. 2019 Dime The Outer Metal Swells without Breaking Away: Reported Clad Blister Error
A rounded swelling can lift part of a clad layer while leaving it attached. Ordinary dimes have bonded metal layers, rather than a thin electroplated surface.
A raised portrait area has been reported on a 2019 dime, but a manufacturing origin is not established. Heating a finished coin can also separate layers and create a blister.
How to Identify
Examine whether the original design continues across the swelling without pressing or puncturing it. Preserved design is useful evidence but does not settle when the separation occurred.
Check the surrounding metal for multiple bubbles, distortion, and other heat-related changes. The intact coin needs examination to distinguish an original bonding defect from later heat damage.
What It’s Worth
If an original bonding defect is confirmed, a visible collectible blister is estimated at $20–$100. The range is conditional, with no authenticated 2019 blister auction result supplied.
The $139 missing-layer coin above represents metal that separated away, not this unconfirmed blister. Heat-damaged dimes do not receive the same mint-error premium.
4. 2019 Dime A Section of the Disc Is Missing: Clipped Planchet Error
An incomplete blank can result when the blanking punch overlaps a previously empty part of the strip. The subsequent strike forms the design around the missing area.
The reported 2019 clip has no firmly established mint or shape. Curved and straight clips describe possible forms, not proof of several separate documented 2019 coins.
How to Identify
Inspect the opening’s endpoints for natural design flow and a strike-softened boundary. Cutting marks, a raised burr, or filing may explain a notch made after minting.
Check the opposite rim for weakness as a supporting clue, without requiring it in every case. A sensible reduction in weight supports missing metal but cannot date the loss.
What It’s Worth
Genuine clips retaining a readable 2019 date are estimated at $20–$300. The size, original boundary, and overall condition influence the comparison.
A 1997-P nickel with a 20% clip brought $124 in March 2025. That other-date, other-denomination result does not establish the size or value of the reported dime clip.
5. 2019 Dime Unstruck Metal Sits beside a Partial Design: Off-Center Strike Error
The Philadelphia report describes roughly 15% displacement, with no direction established. Part of the blank lay outside the dies, leaving a solid empty crescent while design missed the opposite side.
This differs from a clip because the crescent still contains metal. It also requires more than one face with a wide border.
How to Identify
Compare both faces for the corresponding shift and find the surviving 2019 date and P. An undated dime cannot be assigned to this year from its general appearance.
Follow the boundary from struck detail into unused metal. A single misaligned die may shift only one design, while later removal leaves worked surfaces instead of original unstruck metal.
What It’s Worth
Genuine readable-date examples are estimated at $50–$750. No individual sale is assigned to the reported Philadelphia piece.
A 1977 dime struck 10% off center, graded NGC MS64 Full Bands, sold for $109 in June 2026. That older example illustrates the mechanism rather than establishing a fixed price per percentage for 2019.
6. 2019 Dime The Entire Design Remains on Expanded Metal: Broadstrike Error
The collar is the retaining ring that limits a dime’s outward spread during striking. If it does not contain the blank, the metal can widen around a complete design.
A 2019 broadstrike graded PCGS AU55 appears in an error specialist’s illustrated article. Its two photographs show the opposite sides of one coin, and the description does not establish its mint.
How to Identify
Trace the complete outer design before measuring the widened outline. Design lost beyond the edge would require an off-center explanation instead of a simple broadstrike.
Inspect for naturally expanded metal rather than flattened letters or crushing marks. The edge grooves may be incomplete or absent because the collar did not properly contain the strike.
What It’s Worth
A clearly expanded genuine 2019 broadstrike is estimated at $150–$1,000. The illustrated AU55 coin has no adopted completed price.
A 2000-P MS65 dime that was both broadstruck and struck several times sold for $159 in September 2025. Its combined errors and different date make it an imperfect comparison for this single broadstrike.
7. 2019 Dime A Near-Normal Edge Lacks Grooves: Reported Smooth Edge Error
A separate 2019 report concerns a smooth edge on a dime close to normal diameter. The exact collar fault is not established.
The grooves normally form as the coin expands against the patterned collar. Their absence alone does not prove that this coin shares the cause or expanded shape of the broadstrike above.
How to Identify
Inspect the entire edge for residual grooves, grinding lines, and rounded rims. Compare both face borders for evidence of rolling or later edge work.
Reduced diameter or weight may point to removed metal. Even near-normal measurements require original surfaces and a complete edge examination before a manufacturing fault can be established.
What It’s Worth
A confirmed mint-made smooth-edge dime near normal size is conditionally estimated at $30–$300. No documented 2019 sale supports an individual specimen here.
A ground or heavily worn edge does not qualify. The known broadstrike’s unusual expansion cannot supply a premium for every dime with missing grooves.
8. 2019 Dime Raised Lumps or Lines Interrupt the Portrait: Die Chip, Crack, and Cud Error
Small pieces breaking from a die can leave raised lumps near Roosevelt’s head or jaw. The Philadelphia report mainly supports portrait chips rather than one fixed crack route.
A separate reported raised patch meets the right front rim near the date. This rim-connected break is a cud, distinct from an isolated interior chip.
How to Identify
Compare the head and jaw contours with an ordinary dime, then inspect whether the extra metal joins the original surface. Dirt or another attached substance can imitate a lump.
For the cud, follow the raised patch into the right rim and examine the adjacent edge for impact. A later blow can push metal onto the face without a broken die.
What It’s Worth
The estimated range is $5–$300, covering small chips through stronger genuine rim breaks. Tiny portrait lumps generally belong near the low end.
The upper figure is not a recorded 2019 cud sale. It assumes a clearly identified original break with appealing surrounding surfaces.
9. 2019 Dime A Local Impression Blocks Front Detail: Struck Through Error
The documented 2019-P NGC MS68 FT coin has a front struck-through error. Material between the die and blank prevented normal contact in that area.
The catalog did not identify the material. FT describes well-separated reverse torch detail, rather than an additional error.
How to Identify
Compare the interruption with nearby sharp portrait and letter details. General wear affects exposed high points more broadly than a local obstruction.
Check the impression’s boundary for scraping or metal raised by a later impact. Do not identify cloth, wire, or grease unless the actual pattern supports that conclusion.
What It’s Worth
Collectible 2019 strike-throughs are estimated at $20–$500, according to prominence and preservation. The high end assumes a conspicuous feature on an excellent coin.
GreatCollections sold the MS68 FT example in February 2022, but its completed price is not publicly displayed. No dollar result is assigned here, and part of its appeal comes from its very high grade.
10. 2019 Dime Torch or Branch Traces Appear near the Portrait: Die Clash Error
A die clash occurs when the two tools touch without a blank between them. Marks transferred to the tools can then leave traces of the opposite design on later coins.
The 2019 report concerns marks on both faces without an established mint. A possible torch or branch contour near Roosevelt’s neck must fit the opposite design, rather than merely occupy an unusual place.
How to Identify
Photograph both faces in a controlled orientation and compare how the designs face one another in the press. Trace the suspected shape beyond one isolated line.
Random scratches and polishing marks can cross the field without forming a recognizable opposite-face feature. A deep backward impression from another finished coin is also a different mechanism.
What It’s Worth
Genuine recognizable clashes are estimated at $20–$250. Bold matchable torch or branch shapes offer stronger comparisons than faint uncertain lines.
No completed sale is supplied for the reported 2019 example. Identification has to rest on the transferred shape rather than a mark’s proximity to the neck.
11. 2019 Dime Fine Parallel Ridges Cross the Surface: Die Scrapes Error
A groove scratched into a die can fill with coin metal and leave a raised line on the finished dime. A private collection lists a 2019-D example attributed to contact between the feeding mechanism and the die.
Separate Philadelphia reports describe heavier reverse lines. Direct scraping of a finished coin would instead cut into its surface, and die polishing can also create fine raised lines.
How to Identify
Use changing side light to establish whether the lines rise above or cut below the coin surface. Parallel direction alone cannot identify the cause.
Compare the pattern with the same mint’s reported example. A Denver attribution does not establish the location of Philadelphia marks or rule out die polishing on another coin.
What It’s Worth
Clearly visible genuine die-scrape examples are estimated at $5–$50. These subtle marks generally carry a modest premium.
The collector’s 2019-D listing supplies no completed sale. Ordinary surface scratches should not inherit the estimate because they form similar parallel lines.
12. 2019 Dime An Extra Contour Follows the Torch or Branch: Reported Doubled Die Error
A Denver reverse report points to the olive branch and torch as possible doubled-design areas. Front-doubling claims lack an established matching pattern in the supplied evidence.
A doubled die contains repeated design detail created during tool manufacture. Worn dies, normal overlapping leaves, and reflections can also make outlines look crowded.
How to Identify
Confirm the D and compare the same small contour with an ordinary 2019-D dime. Seek a distinct repeated shape rather than an expected overlap between leaves.
A front claim requires its own identified comparison. A reverse report cannot authenticate it, and a flat shelf from striking movement is not proof of a doubled die.
What It’s Worth
Genuine identified doubled designs are estimated at $20–$300. For the unestablished front claim, that range remains conditional on identification.
Neither the front claim nor the reverse report supplies a confirmed auction result here. Flat mechanical doubling usually adds little, so a clear matched contour matters more than a seller’s label.
Conclusion
For a 2019 dime, copper color, a smooth edge, and a swollen surface require separate explanations. Document the whole object and preserve any remaining layer or fragile flap.
The $139 partial missing-layer sale is a direct dated comparison, while many other categories rely on estimates or conditional identification. Match the metal boundary, outline, or specific design trace before applying those ranges, and keep silver Proof construction separate from ordinary clad coins.
