Rare 1885 Morgan Dollar Errors (List & Pictures)
A dollar struck 30% off center brought $7,200 in December 2022 despite a cleaning problem, according to the supplied auction report. Estimated whole-coin values for 1885 Morgan dollar errors span $75–$10,000.
Examine the mintmark and unusual surface features before turning to the edge and overall design placement. Keep each mint’s examples distinct, especially the unconfirmed hollow on a Carson City coin.
1. 1885 Dollar An Extra Edge beside S: Repunched Mintmark Error
The lower-left end of the reverse S can retain part of an earlier mintmark-punch position. A second placement in the die left traces of both impressions for later coins to reproduce.
Different patterns are cataloged, including VAM-6 and VAM-9. Those names do not mean every thick or doubled-looking S matches the same variety.

How to Identify
Locate S between the wreath bow and ONE DOLLAR, then examine the lower-left remnant under changing light. The rounded extra outline should fit an earlier S rather than a shadow.
Use the correct pattern in PCGS’s 1885-S listings. Check the surrounding silver for a seam or disturbance that might suggest an added mintmark.
What It’s Worth
$100–$1,500 is an estimated whole-coin range from worn examples into lower unworn grades. Exact variety and strong visible separation help the comparison.
Exceptional preservation or reflective surfaces can take a dollar beyond that working range. They do not make its mintmark repunching physically larger.
2. 1885 Dollar A Hollow in Front of the Lips: Unresolved Carson City Feature Error
A reported 1885-CC in a GSA holder has a noticeable depression immediately before Liberty’s lips. GSA packaging records a government dollar sale, not an error diagnosis.
Discussion has proposed a blank flaw, peeling metal, or trapped material during striking. Those explanations remain alternatives for one feature rather than several confirmed errors.
How to Identify
Photograph the hollow through its holder with the lips and surrounding field visible. A layered edge could support separation, while an impressed shape and related design interruption might favor a strike-through.
Look independently for scratches, displaced ridges, or corrosion inside the depression. Leave the holder sealed and have an error specialist assess the actual boundary before choosing a cause.
What It’s Worth
$650–$2,500 is a provisional whole-coin estimate if the hollow is confirmed as Mint-made. Much of that value belongs to the Carson City dollar itself.
An unexplained pit earns no automatic error premium. Condition and the resolved origin of the feature remain essential.
3. 1885 Dollar A Thin Flap on the Lower Reverse: Lamination Error
A cataloged New Orleans example has peeling between about 4:30 and 6 o’clock on the upright reverse. Its VF description indicates substantial wear with the main design still recognizable.
Lamination opens a weakness within the silver-copper alloy, sometimes leaving an attached sheet. A local peel is different from the whole dollar splitting into two discs.

How to Identify
Use side lighting at the lower-right border toward the bottom and follow the layer to its attached end. Observe whether struck detail continues onto the flap or its neighboring surface.
A sharp trench or scraping may indicate later tool damage instead. Do not lift the layer to test it, since that changes the original feature.
What It’s Worth
$75–$500 is an estimated range for circulated 1885-O dollars and modest examples with a clear peel. No particular lamination sale amount is supplied.
An attached natural layer and readable surroundings can make the error easier to appreciate. A much higher-grade dollar may carry substantial additional value for preservation.
4. 1885 Dollar An Impression or Embedded Pieces: Strike-Through Error
A New Orleans PCGS MS63 has a reverse impression described as 1.25 inches long. Other specimens include a separate MS61 reverse impression and an MS63 front impression.
A Philadelphia PCGS MS62 was cataloged with three retained staple-like pieces on the reverse near 6 and 12 o’clock. Retained objects differ from empty depressions where the obstruction no longer remains.

How to Identify
For an empty impression, follow how the struck design meets its boundary. A later scratch may cut finished detail and leave pushed-up metal instead.
For retained pieces, inspect the attachment points without bending or pulling anything. Glue, a later puncture, or a fragment resting against the holder can imitate an embedded object.
The long measurement belongs to one New Orleans reverse impression. The three staple-like pieces belong to the separate Philadelphia coin and should not be assigned to every foreign-looking speck.
What It’s Worth
$125–$3,000 is the estimated range across clear impressions and securely authenticated retained pieces. The 1885-O MS61 reverse strike-through sold for $159 in June 2026.
The separate PCGS MS63 with the long reverse impression brought $240 in June 2023. These unworn coins have different marks and impressions, while a prominent retained object needs its own comparison.
5. 1885 Dollar A Step beside the Edge Grooves: Partial Collar Error
A reported 1885-O in AU condition has an edge divided into levels. Part of the blank sat inside the collar ring and received grooves while another part could spread beyond that restraint.
The resulting step needs an edge view. A wide border visible from the front is not sufficient to establish a partial collar.

How to Identify
Turn the edge past a fixed light and follow the junction between the grooved band and expanded metal. Filing may leave a smooth strip with tool cuts instead of naturally spread silver.
A loose normal Morgan measures about 38.1 mm across, useful when checking several widths. Keep a graded coin sealed and use side photographs rather than opening the holder for measurements.
What It’s Worth
$100–$750 is the estimate for a genuine 1885-O partial collar in circulated through modest unworn condition. The reported AU coin has light wear, but no price is supplied for it.
An 1882-CC MS65 partial collar brought $480 in September 2025. That different date and mint demonstrates the mechanism’s market without serving as a sale of the reported 1885-O.
6. 1885 Dollar The Picture Runs beyond the Blank: Off-Center Strike Error
A reported 1885 dollar struck 30% off center was graded NGC XF Details Cleaned. The shift is a minting error, while wear and cleaning describe its later condition.
A separate 1885-O graded PCGS AU53 is 8% off center. Neither percentage establishes a direction by itself.
How to Identify
Connect the unstruck crescent with missing design on both faces. A complete design inside extra metal suggests broadstriking, while one shifted face can indicate die misalignment.
Inspect the untouched area for grinding or cutting and retain a full outline in photographs. The normal 26.73 g standard can help flag removed metal on a loose coin, but the strike boundary provides the decisive visible evidence.
What It’s Worth
$1,500–$10,000 is an estimated range for authenticated examples with varied displacement and preservation. Mint Error News reports $7,200 for the 30% coin in Heritage’s December 2022 results.
That reported price includes the coin’s cleaning problem. The smaller 8% New Orleans shift needs a closer comparison than automatically adopting the same amount.
Conclusion
The extra S, peeling reverse, edge step, and incomplete strike on 1885 Morgan dollars each reveal a different production event. The Carson City hollow remains an unresolved observation until its surface evidence supports a cause.
Use the $75–$10,000 estimates with the correct mint and condition, keeping separate specimens and their measurements distinct. Leave attached flakes and retained pieces untouched so their original relationship to the design remains available for examination.
