Rare 2007 Dime Errors (List & Pictures)
The smallest clue on a 2007 dime may be an extra olive-leaf contour, while the largest error may not have started as a coin blank at all. An aluminum feeder-finger fragment carrying three dime strikes has a published result of $2,990.
Estimated values for 2007 dime errors span $15–$4,000. Inspect raised details and interrupted design first, then follow surface layers, the edge, altered shapes, and unusual struck objects.
| Clue | Category | Estimated range |
|---|---|---|
| Extra leaf or letter outlines | Doubled die | $20–$150 |
| Raised lines or displaced design patches | Die cracks and breaks | $20–$750 |
| Woven or other recessed impression | Strike-through | $30–$500 |
| Peeling metal | Lamination or layer separation | $15–$200 |
| Stepped edge | Partial collar | $40–$250 |
| Incomplete or oval blank | Clipped planchet | $20–$300 |
| Expanded complete design | Broadstrike | $40–$350 |
| Displaced incomplete design | Off-center strike | $40–$600 |
| Cup or matching reversed impression | Die cap or mated pair | $250–$1,500 |
| Design on copper-plated zinc | Reported cent-planchet strike | $300–$2,500 |
| Overlapping designs on irregular aluminum | Struck feeder-finger fragment | $2,000–$4,000 |
1. 2007 Dime An Olive Leaf Has an Extra Contour: Doubled Die Error
The Philadelphia reverse variety has extra detail along the right side of the central olive leaf above RIB in PLURIBUS. It concerns the leaf, not the torch bands.
How to Identify
Confirm P beside the date and match the actual contour with Wexler’s 2007-P descriptions. The repeated shape originated in the die before striking.
A separate obverse report concerns thick lettering in the motto, JS initials, date, and mint mark, with further examination noted as useful. Glare or flat striking-related shelves should not be promoted to a confirmed match from thickness alone.
What It’s Worth
$20–$150 is an estimate for genuine minor doubled dies with identifiable detail. No completed sale is supplied for these reports, and a clear extra leaf outline provides stronger evidence than a vague thick-looking date.
2. 2007 Dime Lines and Raised Patches Interrupt the Design: Cracked and Broken Dies Error
Cracks in a die can leave raised ridges, while missing or shifted die portions can create larger areas of abnormal relief. A retained break may still carry design because the damaged piece stayed in place at a different level.
How to Identify
Compare the damaged area’s height with adjoining original design. A scratch cuts down, while dirt or attached material may have a separate texture or boundary.
Philadelphia reports concern shattered dies and retained breaks. A separate Denver interior break is reported around the mouth and cheek; an interior lump need not connect to the rim as a cud does.
What It’s Worth
$20–$750 is an estimate spanning small cracks through dramatic examples. Historical Philadelphia dealer offers included $225 for a reverse break and $250–$275 for heavily shattered obverses.
A $750 offer covered a two-coin set. These were asking prices, and the group amount is neither an individual sale nor a price for the Denver mouth-and-cheek report.
3. 2007 Dime Material Leaves a Texture or Depression: Struck Through Cloth or Other Material Error
A 2007-D cloth strike-through appears in the supplied year report. Another description mentions a possible wire-like line inside a deep die cap, a separate coin with different overall formation.
How to Identify
Look for repeated weave texture when evaluating a cloth attribution and examine where the obstruction interrupted normal design. A narrow groove alone does not prove wire, and a later scratch can cross already completed detail.
The cap’s inner line needs comparison with that specimen’s protected surface. Leave it unprobed and preserve the description’s uncertainty about the material.
What It’s Worth
$30–$500 is an estimate for genuine standalone impressions, depending on recognizable texture and preservation. The deep cap’s $460 sale covered its entire combination of features and is not a separate strike-through price to add to a cap value.
4. 2007 Dime A Thin Flap Opens within the Metal: Lamination and Layer Separation Error
A modern clad dime can separate within one metal layer or along the bond between an outer layer and its copper center. Those mechanisms can both leave peeling surfaces, but are not automatically the same flaw.
How to Identify
Follow the visible separation into the surrounding metal and check whether original design remains on a flap. Do not lift it; its attachment preserves evidence.
The supplied 2007 report establishes no particular mint or face. Scraped channels, tool marks, or corrosion should be distinguished from a natural layer boundary.
A loose ordinary clad dime normally weighs about 2.268 grams and measures 17.91 millimeters, with reeding around the edge. A retained flap may leave weight nearly unchanged, and these references also help with the shape errors below.
What It’s Worth
$15–$200 is an estimate for modest genuine metal separations. A readable large retained flap can attract more interest than a small worn patch, but artificial peeling does not qualify for the same premium.
5. 2007 Dime Two Edge Bands Sit at Different Widths: Partial Collar Error
A blank only partly inside the collar can spread along its unrestrained portion while the other band remains contained. The result is a stepped edge, reported on a 2007-P MS65 example.
How to Identify
Inspect the side profile for a confined reeded band beside a less confined expanded band. One flattened patch or an uneven obverse rim is not equivalent evidence.
Compare several edge positions and check the smooth area for filing or rolling marks. The reported grade describes preservation, not the step’s size.
What It’s Worth
$40–$250 is an estimate for genuine partial-collar dimes with a visible step. No completed sale is supplied for the MS65 report, so an actual edge view is needed to judge how strong a comparison it offers.
6. 2007 Dime A Curved Gap Interrupts a Round or Oval Blank: Clipped Planchet Error
Philadelphia reports include a curved clip, while the illustrated Denver coin combines an elliptical blank with a curved gap on its right side. These are different original blank shapes.
How to Identify
Compare the complete outline with Error-Ref’s Denver illustration, then inspect the gap’s rim junctions. An oval candidate should be measured along both axes rather than treated as an ordinary circle.
Natural design flow near the shortage differs from a sharp cut through finished metal. A split wall on a cup-shaped die cap is also a different event from an incomplete original blank.
What It’s Worth
$20–$300 is an estimate for genuine clipped examples. The Denver oval-and-curved-clip combination is one coin, with its size, readable identity, and preservation considered together rather than separate full clip values added.
7. 2007 Dime The Whole Design Sits within Expanded Metal: Broadstrike Error
A collar that fails to restrain the blank allows metal to spread beyond its usual diameter. The recorded Philadelphia example is graded NGC MS66 FT, with FT describing strong torch detail rather than another error.
How to Identify
Trace outer lettering on both faces and compare the enlarged outline with a normal dime at the same scale. A complete design within spread metal supports broadstriking.
Inspect the edge for later flattening and consider partial collar if two distinct levels survive. Missing design beside an unstruck crescent calls for an off-center comparison.
What It’s Worth
$40–$350 is an estimate for clear genuine broadstrikes. The certified 2007-P listing supplies no usable realized price in the provided record.
A different 2000-P dime with multiple strikes and broadstriking sold for $159 in September 2025. Its additional strikes should not be assigned to the 2007-P example.
8. 2007 Dime A Blank Crescent Opposes Missing Design: Off-Center Strike Error
The reported 2007-P MS66 dime has no supplied displacement percentage or direction. Its attribution requires a misplaced blank that explains incomplete design and unused metal on both faces.
How to Identify
Keep the date and P visible in straight-on photographs of the whole coin. A front-only shift beside a centered reverse can indicate die misalignment, while complete design inside a wide border fits broadstriking.
Inspect the transition to bare metal for grinding or artificial smoothing. A high grade does not establish the geometry of the error.
What It’s Worth
$40–$600 is an estimate for genuine dated examples. A 1977 dime struck about 10% off-center sold for $109 in June 2026, a modest-error comparison from another year rather than a price for the reported MS66 coin.
9. 2007 Dime The Coin Becomes a Cup or Matches a Reversed Impression: Die Caps and Mated Pair Error
A coin stuck to a die can grow into a cup as more blows stretch its metal around the tool. Supplied Denver reports include obverse caps, a satin piece with a split sidewall, and a deep reverse cap attributed as (2007-D) because its date is unreadable.
How to Identify
Follow design into the sidewall without flattening the cap. A torn cap wall should not be mistaken for the curved clip of an original blank.
In the separate 2007-D satin mated pair, one coin’s reverse impressed a sunken mirror image into the other’s obverse. The receiving coin developed a cap rim while its partner acquired distorted borders.
Compare those contact features through photographs and keep satin Mint Set surfaces distinct from ordinary strikes. The deep reverse cap’s parenthesized date must remain qualified.
What It’s Worth
$250–$1,500 is an estimate for cap examples or an intact matched pair, depending on form and condition. The attributed deep reverse cap sold for $460 on May 1, 2009.
The 2007-D satin pair brought $1,116.25 on November 1, 2016. That result covers both coins and all their linked features together.
10. 2007 Dime A Dime Design Covers Copper-Plated Zinc: Reported Cent-Planchet Strike Error
The year guide reports a 2007 dime struck on a cent blank. A modern cent blank is larger than a dime blank and has copper plating over zinc, unlike a dime’s copper center and bonded outer layers.
How to Identify
Compare actual measurements with the cent blank’s nominal 2.50 grams and 19.05 millimeters, allowing for shape changes during striking. Then confirm the metal structure and a genuine 2007 Roosevelt design.
Staining, added plating, or a missing clad layer can create misleading copper color. Underlying earlier coin details would also require a struck-over-coin explanation rather than an unused blank.
What It’s Worth
$300–$2,500 is a conditional estimate for an authenticated dime on modern cent stock. The supplied 2007 report includes no verified sale, and the reverse event of cent dies striking a dime is a different error.
11. 2007 Dime Three Dime Designs Overlap on Irregular Aluminum: Struck Feeder-Finger Fragment Error
The reported 2007-D PCGS MS64 object began as a broken aluminum tip from the machinery that moves blanks into place. The fragment itself received three strikes.
How to Identify
Match the recognizable repeated portrait and lettering with the published specimen and establish its aluminum identity. This differs from a normal dime merely carrying an impression where machinery blocked the strike.
Record the actual weight and dimensions instead of copying a label number, because the supplied accounts use conflicting weight units. Normal dime standards are comparison points, not required measurements for machinery scrap.
Examine the fracture surfaces and stamped relief together. An irregular silver-gray object without authenticated material and coherent strikes is not enough to establish this error.
What It’s Worth
$2,000–$4,000 is an estimate for a comparable authenticated machinery-fragment error. The published auction account records $2,990 for the triple-struck 2007-D piece.
That result belongs to this identified struck fragment. It does not price an ordinary dime with a small feeder-related strike-through mark.
Conclusion
The strongest 2007 dime comparisons combine shape with the design that explains it. A stepped edge, oval clipped blank, expanded complete strike, and cap sidewall each preserve different evidence.
For the unusual examples, keep inferred dates, satin finishes, paired coins, and machinery fragments accurately described. Preserve attached metal and compare specimen-specific measurements rather than forcing every object to fit a normal dime’s dimensions.
